Which is better gnp or gdp

In the most recent report, the U. For its composite Human Development Index, the UN measures three basic aspects of quality of life: health and longevity, knowledge, and income. Anybody with enough statistical skills and time on her hands can now construct national rankings to match her priorities. This UN ranking considers levels of inequality in the three aspects measured by the Human Development Index. As he struggled to convey the complex story of the progress he had witnessed, he enlisted his son and daughter-in-law—both artists—to help.

The result was software, since acquired by Google, that animates the movement of different indicators over time. How compelling? A talk Rosling gave at the TED conference has been viewed more than 3. The idea that economic and other data can be better presented with a dashboard of indicators than as a single number or ranked list is very much in the air among experts and policy makers.

After all, happiness is what Jeremy Bentham was out to maximize way back when. In the s and s psychologists and sociologists reopened the question of whether it could be quantified.

Opinion polls, then entering their heyday as measurers and in some cases determiners of the public mood, were an obvious vehicle for the attempt. The economist Richard Easterlin imported the happiness discussion to his discipline with a paper pointing out that the results of national happiness polls did not correlate all that well with per capita income. It took quite a while for the so-called Easterlin paradox to garner much attention from other economists.

But the recent emergence of behavioral economics, which takes psychological research seriously, has caused an explosion of surveys about happiness and well-being. The trend has been fueled by the example of Bhutan, where the former king Jigme Singye Wangchuck began talking about gross national happiness in the s, shortly after he came to power. A interview with the Financial Times alerted the world to his views—sending a long parade of happiness pilgrims to Bhutan and spurring the king to eventually convert GNH into something tangible enough to measure with development indicators and polling data.

The interest in happiness surveys has also led to critical scrutiny of the Easterlin paradox. They were unable to conclusively debunk the argument that rises in income over time fail to deliver increased happiness, but the evidence they marshaled certainly muddied the waters. Meanwhile, other researchers have begun to distinguish between happiness surveys that ask people to evaluate how satisfied they are with their lives and ones that focus on emotional states at specific times.

The first quality is closely linked to income; the second is not. These would combine time-use surveys conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics since with measures of economic value and maybe even happiness. The concept applies its own number-crunching precision to the study of well-being, but it uses different numbers—minutes. There are limits, though, to how far the Bureau of Economic Analysis is willing to go.

You have 1 free article s left this month. You are reading your last free article for this month. Subscribe for unlimited access.

Create an account to read 2 more. Behavioral economics. The Economics of Well-Being. Have we found a better gauge of success than GDP? Reprint: RD Gross domestic product has long been the chief measure of national success. Qatar 2. Liechtenstein 3. United Arab Emirates 4. Singapore 5. Luxembourg 6. Kuwait 7. Norway 8. GDP determines the economic health of a nation.

You may also have a look at the following articles —. Your email address will not be published. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Free Investment Banking Course.

Login details for this Free course will be emailed to you. Forgot Password? Article by Madhuri Thakur. What is GDP? The values used in calculating GDP are the market values of final goods and services—that is, the value of the vehicle engine that Toyota makes is not explicitly included in GDP; their value is included in the final prices of Vehicles that use the engines.

Similarly, the value of a Rembrandt painting that sells for 15 million euros is not included in the computation of GDP, as it was not produced during the period. The goods and services provided by the government are covered in GDP even though they are not explicitly priced in markets. The total of both figures are divided by the population of the relevant country to get the figure per capita which is the one used when comparing the figures of different countries.

This rate is not influenced by inflation as the prices for the basis year are taken for both years. The GNP per capita is not only the average income in a country - countries with a higher GNP can usually afford a better health care and educational system Weltbank They normally have a higher life expectancy, better access to drinking water and a lower child mortality rate.

They typically do better in all of this sort of indicators. To summarize it: there is a strong correlation between the GNP and the development of a country. By using the GDP or the GNP there are some preconditions which should be fulfilled to get a valuable information out of it.

For developing countries it is often very significant. It is quite obvious that the profits western companies get from their facilities in developing countries do not contribute to the living standard of the people in the developing countries. Another problem is that you cannot simply compare the value of a Dollar in any given country and the value of a Dollar in the U.

To solve this problem you have to use GNP figures which are converted according to purchasing power parity. This takes the different prices in different countries into account. Another problem occurs with growth rates. Although it gives a useful hint about the progress a country has made last year, it is crucial to keep in mind that a poor country with high growth rates does not necessarily better than a rich one with moderate growth rates as the growth is always related to the basis. However even when keeping all this conditions in mind the value of the GNP and the GDP as an indicator for development is significantly reduced by its following problems.

In the following I will usually refer to the GNP per capita after purchasing power parity but of course the same problems are true for the GDP too. Seminar Paper, 11 Pages, Grade: 2. M L Martin Lochner Author.